Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1675 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 69% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $21.1 vs $68.02
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - $0.05 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G3420 - 463 vs 459 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
459
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |