Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3420 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3420 is 313 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-6300 - 227 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 19% cheaper than Pentium G3420 - $58.04 vs $71.62
- Up to 19% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G3420 - $0.26 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 6 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
81.25%
Price, $
$71.62
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $71.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1594 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
224
98.6784140969163%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |