Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1681 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $51.36 vs $101.79
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-9400F - $0.27 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G3258 - 204 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 6 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
193
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |