Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 53 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 41% better in FIFA 23 than Pentium G3250 - 144 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 44 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
49.02127659574468%
Multi-Core
981
10.198565339432374%
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
2 | Threads | 44 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |