Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1137 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $61.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.29 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Pentium G3250 - 223 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
59%
Price, $
$109.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |