Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G3220 - 210 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |