Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2976 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2130
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $43.64 vs $85.13
- Up to 48% better value when playing Control than Core i3-10105F - $0.22 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Pentium G2130 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2130 - 8 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
199
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5657 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
52%
Price, $
$85.13
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |