Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 628 days older than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 15 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium 3825U - 169 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |