Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Pentium 3805U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1279 days newer than Pentium 3805U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3805U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Pentium 3805U - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3805U - 32 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3805U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |