Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Pentium 2117U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 737 days newer than Pentium 2117U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2117U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 17 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium 2117U - 99 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2117U - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium 2117U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2117U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
