Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2087 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 99% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 4 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 43% better in F1 23 than Core M-5Y51 - 240 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |