Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2508 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 4 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core M-5Y10c - 329 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 16 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core M-5Y10c
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core M-5Y10c
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Single-Core
600
26.109660574412537%
Multi-Core
1170
11.708195737015911%
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core M | Collection | Xeon E |
| Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 8.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
