Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9980XE is 2331 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980XE
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - 175 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-9980XE - $19.59 vs $1097.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9980XE - $0.13 vs $6.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,097 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
149
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |