Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i9-9980HK on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 83 days older than Core i9-9980HK.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 45 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-9980HK - 418 vs 416 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9980HK - 56 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9980HK
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980HK | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 28 |
| 16 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
