Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 7% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 113 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9980HK - 24 vs 16 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-9980HK
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980HK | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
