Buy on Amazon
$495.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2097 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G2130 - 415 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2130 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2130
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $43.64 vs $495.15
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-9920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC6)
Buy for $495.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76689 minutes ago
Intel Pentium G2130 3.20 GHz DUAL-CORE Processor, Socket H2 LGA-1155
Buy for $43.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Pentium G2130
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G2130
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Single-Core
539
38.145789101203114%
Multi-Core
926
9.807244227917813%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
