Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 402 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $587.46 vs $1675.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $2.14 vs $6.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 165 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i9-9920X - 279 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 64 vs 24 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
275
98%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6/FPS
35%
Price, $
$1675
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 32 |
24 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |