Buy on Amazon
$556
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2329 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Pentium G640 - 152 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $30.0 vs $556.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900X - $0.21 vs $3.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.66/FPS
5.737704918032787%
Price, $
$556
5%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC5)
Buy for $556 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
144
94.73684210526315%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
444
29.838709677419356%
Multi-Core
750
7.881462799495587%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
