Buy on Amazon
$363.56
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 159 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 24 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$363.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Core I9-9900T ES QQC0 CPU 1.7GHz 16MB 35W 8 Cores 16 Thread 14nm 9thGeneration CPU LGA1151 for I9 9900T
Buy for $363.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
