Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-6300 - 132 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $68.02 vs $299.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900T - $0.53 vs $2.27 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
23.348017621145374%
Price, $
$299
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
129
97.72727272727273%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
88.06699232379623%
Multi-Core
2539
42.359025692359026%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |