Buy on Amazon
$554.05
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1694 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-8370 - 266 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $248.02 vs $554.05
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-9900T - $0.97 vs $2.08 per FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
46.63461538461538%
Price, $
$554.05
44%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I9-9900T I9 9900T 2.1 GHz Used Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread CPU Processor 16M 35W LGA 1151
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53062 minutes ago
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
256
96.2406015037594%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$248.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for $248.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
