Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 104% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 194 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $58.04 vs $554.05
- Up to 79% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-9900T - $0.61 vs $2.86 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
21.328671328671327%
Price, $
$554.05
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1640 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
95
48.96907216494845%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |