Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2611 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3220 - 138 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $79.0 vs $1989.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900KS - $0.68 vs $14.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 55 vs 127 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
127 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |