Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G550 - 594 vs 436 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $49.0 vs $286.74
- Up to 77% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KF - $0.11 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
594
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
22%
Price, $
$286.74
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |