Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 560 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $179.99 vs $272.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900KF - $1.34 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $272 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
134
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |