Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1874 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 147 vs 121 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$412
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $412 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |