Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$459
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |