Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 207 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 69 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$409
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 69 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |