Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than FX-4100 - 181 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $16.0 vs $412.0
- Up to 96% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-9900K - $0.1 vs $2.28 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $412 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Buy for $16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |