Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 36 days older than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Xeon E-2276M - 62 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$336
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $336 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |