Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 840 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930 - 179 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $63.92 vs $459.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-9900 - $0.4 vs $2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $459.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |