Buy on Amazon
$339
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 621 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 118 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $270.0 vs $339.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-9900 - $2.37 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-9900 Coffee Lake Processor 3.1GHz 8.0GT/s 16MB LGA 1151 CPU, Retail
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4931 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
114
96%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4932 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
