Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i9-9880H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 373 days newer than Core i9-9880H.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9880H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-9880H - 122 vs 121 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9880H | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |