Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 972 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-7940X - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $225.0 vs $397.83
- Up to 46% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-7940X - $1.68 vs $3.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12650 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |