Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1292 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7940X - 145 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $201.95 vs $422.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7940X - $1.39 vs $3.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $422 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$201.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $201.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |