Buy on Amazon
$384
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2602 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-760 - 131 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $100.0 vs $384.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-7940X - $0.85 vs $2.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-7940X X-Series Processor 14 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $384 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
