Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 731 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 217 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $70.0 vs $385.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-7940X - $0.33 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |