Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1774 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8300 - 131 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $106.06 vs $314.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-7940X - $0.91 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10435 minutes ago
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |