Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 849 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $90.0 vs $326.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-7920X - $0.35 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
27.55905511811023%
Price, $
$326
27%
Buy for $326 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3677 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
98.24046920821115%
Multi-Core
4079
44.81432652164359%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |