Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1942 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $299.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400F - $2.67 vs $7.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-7920X - 127 vs 112 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
112
88%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.09/FPS
37%
Price, $
$899.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |