Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2160 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6100 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $29.65 vs $326.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-7920X - $0.27 vs $2.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
9.608540925266905%
Price, $
$326
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $326 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
109
93.96551724137932%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |