Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1884 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-3450 - 175 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $95.0 vs $325.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-7900X - $0.6 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10156 minutes ago
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |