Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 174 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3930T - 234 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $39.0 vs $325.0
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76155 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
38.53727144866385%
Multi-Core
948
10.796036897847626%
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |