Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 741 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 3400G - 128 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $98.15 vs $412.83
- Up to 75% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-7900X - $0.8 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
24%
Price, $
$412.83
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18234 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
122
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |