Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 3600XT - 285 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $168.11 vs $436.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-14900KF - $0.74 vs $1.53 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
48.36601307189542%
Price, $
$436
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $436 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25315 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
79.64912280701755%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$168.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $168.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1704
54.826254826254825%
Multi-Core
7222
34.321832525425336%
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |