Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3780 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-9370 - 139 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $191.43 vs $442.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900KF - $2.1 vs $3.19 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
65.8307210031348%
Price, $
$442.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $442.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50959 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
91
65.46762589928058%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$191.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $191.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |