Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 166 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $39.0 vs $749.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900K - $0.34 vs $4.51 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
7.5388026607538805%
Price, $
$749
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61751 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
116
69.87951807228916%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
17.67171880038697%
Multi-Core
948
4.514285714285714%
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |