Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i9-14900HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F and Core i9-14900HX have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900HX - 164 vs 159 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$521.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57260 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Single-Core
2802
92.78145695364238%
Multi-Core
16516
90.39956212370005%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |