Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2463 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 1600X - 295 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
37.18543046357616%
Multi-Core
4766
26.08648056923919%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
![[2024] MSI Aegis R2 C14NUF9-829US Pro Extreme (Intel Core i9-14900F, 64GB DDR5 RAM, 4TB NVMe SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B0D2DFMF19.jpg)
