Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2631 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 231 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $578.97 vs $1595.95
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valheim than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.51 vs $8.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900 - 44 vs 32 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$578.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $578.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
198
85.71428571428571%
Value, $/FPS
$8.06/FPS
31.14143920595533%
Price, $
$1595.95
36%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
39.88458927359131%
Multi-Core
9619
60.6379625543718%
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
32 | Threads | 44 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |